This weekend, after a month and a half of reading 30 min - 1 hour each day, I finally finished Atlas Shrugged. At 1068 pages with print the size of Biblical text, it is the largest literary undertaking thus far of my existence. And I have to say, I quite enjoyed it.Ayn Rand, known mostly for The Fountainhead, does not separate her beliefs from her fiction. In fact, nearly every word of her texts unquestionably promotes her disdain for a communist or socialized society, and instead advocates objectivism.
Objectivism is the philosophy developed by the Russian-American philosopher and novelist, Ayn Rand (1905–1982). Objectivism holds that reality exists independent of consciousness; that the proper moral purpose of one's life is the pursuit of one's own happiness or rational self-interest; that the only social system consistent with this morality is full respect for individual rights, embodied in pure laissez faire capitalism.
While many of my friends greatly object to her ideas and philosophies, there were quite a lot of sub-plot lines with which I was able to get on board. She believes that the government should not support those who refuse to contribute to society, and that governmental "hand-outs" promote the weak for being weak and harm the successful, contributing members of society.
While I am a huge fan of nationalized health-care, I agree with Rand's idea that you are entitled to nothing simply by existing.
Now, my beliefs on this matter are largely related to what I have experienced . Namely, within my familial structure, there exists 1 person who is taking advantage of governmental programs (does not work, lives on welfare, food stamps, etc.), and 1 person who is unable to work (but desperately wishes to) who lives on Disability and Medicaid. I support people who wish to work, or have done so when physically able, but I do NOT condone those who simply use taxpayers money because it's "free and easy."
Beliefs aside (and anyone who knows me knows that I know NOTHING about politics, and don't profess to have too many beliefs, in general), this book was an interesting read, most notably because it was Rand's last work first published in 1957. Concerns that she had then are still alive and provoking debates over 50 years later.
More than anything, I'm really proud that I finally read this book. It's been on "my list of things to do" for many years now. Finishing it feels quite good. And I truly liked it, although I have little desire to argue about its content.
Now for another book. This time I'm going to choose something that doesn't have a 50 page, 3 hour long speech in it, though.


